You can get your orders delivered in two to three days, but you may also opt for overnight shipping. Their most expensive pair of shoes is the Saint Laurent ‘Era 110” over-the-knee boots, which you can rent for $250.Ĭhristian Louboutin Paulina slingback pumpsĪside from shoes, they also have a collection of clothes, bags, and other accessories available for rent. Most of their Christian Louboutin shoes have a rent price of $65.

They carry numerous luxury brands including Hermes, Chanel, Christian Dior, Gucci, Louis Vuitton, Prada, Saint Laurent, Givenchy, Christian Louboutin, Jimmy Choo, Giuseppe Zanotti, and more! Style Lend is a peer-to-peer closet rental service with n array of designer boots, pumps, sandals, loafers, and flats that you can rent for up to seven days for as low as $25. The next time you get invited to a wedding, a formal gathering, a special event, or a party, you can wear your dream shoes without breaking the bank. It is for this reason that most award shows today are attempting to be more sustainable.īelow is a list of websites that offer shoe rental services. Not only will it save you money, but it will also help save the environment.Īccording to reports, the fashion industry accounts for about 10% of all greenhouse gas emissions and nearly 20% of wastewater. There are surprisingly a good number of websites that allow us to rent luxury items, including designer shoes! Instead of buying pricey heels at the risk of being cheated, you can simply rent them at a fraction of the cost. This is why we’re grateful for rental services. Also, if you’re attending a special occasion, spending a fortune on brand new designer items that you’ll only wear once is not practical. Luxury designer goods come with hefty price tags, which are a major deal-breaker especially for fashionistas on a tight budget. Much cheaper than buying, you can save money by renting Christian Louboutin shoes (Credit: Steve Searle / WENN) While there’s so much to love about designer goods, like the high-quality materials and craftsmanship, there’s one thing we surely hate the most about them: prices. Moreover, seeing how good celebrities and fashion icons look in designer clothes makes us want to copy their style and splurge on the exact same thing they’re wearing. Since the interview failed to show the defendant’s shoes to the interviewees, it would be irrelevant to prove a likelihood of confusion between the shoes.īased on the foregoing, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s allegations under the Unfair Competition Prevention Law and did not side with Louboutin.Who would say no to designer goods? Almost every trendsetter dreams of wearing a luxury item-whether it be clothes, bags, or shoes-designed by her favorite fashion designer. The interview targeted consumers who have purchased high-end goods and famous brands.Because of the difference in respective materials on soles (lacquered leather for Louboutin, and rubber for defendant shoes), there exists a distinction in texture and luster to the extent that relevant consumers can easily distinguish the quality and source of respective goods.Being that Louboutin’s shoes has the stylized mark “Louboutin” on soles as well, it is unlikely that relevant consumers connect the defendant’s shoes bearing the wordmark “EIZO” on soles with Louboutin. Given Louboutin’s shoes are known for high-end heels that cost JPY80,000 and more, relevant consumers would pay attention to selecting and purchasing suitable goods.Under the practice in commerce, two decades and advertisement would be insufficient to find Louboutin’s red soles have played a role in the source indicator in Japan.īesides, the court found the unlikelihood of confusion between Louboutin and the defendant’s shoes on the grounds that:.Ladies’ heels with red-colored soles have been widely distributed even before the launch of Louboutin shoes in Japan. Red color has been commonly used on shoes to enhance the aesthetic appearance and attract consumers.The Tokyo District Court denied a certain degree of reputation and popularity of the red soles to indicate Louboutin shoes by stating: It should note that Louboutin’s attempt to register the position mark representing ladies’ heels with red-colored soles in 2015 has been pending by the Japan Patent Office due to a lack of inherent and acquired distinctiveness as of now.

In the litigation, Louboutin sought a permanent injunction, disposal of the disputed shoes, and damages in the amount of JPY4,208,000.

Christian louboutin shoes red bottom